I’ve already mentioned how Amazon and Wikipedia own most proper nouns, but there’s one category I ignored: full names. That’s currently a fight between LinkedIn and Facebook. Facebook has more links and more profiles, but LinkedIn has more tricks up their sleeve.
But first, an experiment: Google the full names of half a dozen of your coworkers. You may find personal sites. You may discover that some of them have the same names as famous foreign athletes. But you’ll mostly see their LinkedIn and Facebook accounts. How can it be that Facebook’s 464 million links can’t consistently beat LinkedIn’s 30 million links?
First, LinkedIn has made more information available, for longer. Until recently, linking to a Facebook profile meant linking to a tiny image, a name, and perhaps a list of friends. LinkedIn drops the friend list and the image, but gives information on past jobs and education. Unless you’ve previously posted your resume online, this makes your LinkedIn public profile the default place to link when talking about your career.
But LinkedIn really shines with their internal linking. Googleable places that link to my profile with my name as the anchor text include:
Recently Updated Profiles, which is a page I’m sure search engines love to visit.
A directory of people by last name with my last name in the URL.
Another directory, whose purpose I don’t really understand. It overlaps a little with the previous directory. If I were in LinkedIn’s position, I would probably want to update pages as often as they were indexed; if I could get search engines to index two sets of pages with the same information, it would double the speed at which they got indexed.
A Company page: (And the company pages of places I’ve worked before). This is particularly clever: LinkedIn displays names based on who is more interesting to readers—the more people are interested in searching for you, and potentially writing high-value content about you offsite, the harder LinkedIn tries to keep you.
LinkedIn is optimized for owning names. They’ve created pages with unique, useful content—and uses them to pass valuable links within the site. At the same time, there aren’t many LinkedIn pages that aren’t valuable to someone who ends up finding them through a search.
After all that work, it’s ironic that LinkedIn is the only site that can search information Google indexes, but better than Google can. LinkedIn doesn’t have better search engineers, but they do know which parts of a page are first names, last names, and employers—just a little more evidence that better data can beat better algorithms.
If you liked this, you may also want to check out this analysis of LinkedIn’s prospectus.
September 24th, 2009 at 11:09 am
[…] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Sayem Islam. Sayem Islam said: RT: @byrneseyeview: LinkedIn’s SEO Strategy: Own Names (http://bit.ly/XJCaB) […]
September 25th, 2009 at 10:33 am
[…] LinkedIn.com’s SEO is designed to do one thing and one thing only: make sure they own your name on Google. To do this, they’ve created several alphabetical directories (which search engines can […]
December 5th, 2009 at 6:28 am
it's cool!
March 24th, 2010 at 9:54 am
Yes Thts Correct we can choose own name in profile url that helps SEO
June 1st, 2010 at 6:12 am
That is actually a good observation. I myself think that LinkedIn profiles are more reliable than Facebook profiles.
July 12th, 2010 at 6:13 pm
Thank you very much for this seo information.
August 1st, 2010 at 3:17 am
Actually I don't care about the comparison on Facebook and LinkedIn because they are both good in promoting websites and business and have a good benefits on users.
September 2nd, 2010 at 2:55 pm
Thanks for posting this info. I just want to let you know that I just check out your site and I find it very interesting and informative.
October 26th, 2010 at 7:37 am
I am using LinkedIn since a long time, but as it helps in indexing , I am trying to promote my site through that and hope that I will get good result through that.
March 5th, 2011 at 7:40 pm
[…] also has another advantage: they have consciously tried to own people’s names as an SEO strategy. This is probably responsible for a huge fraction of their traffic. They don’t find people […]
March 7th, 2011 at 8:46 am
ನೆರಳಿನ ಸಂದಿ ಸಂದಿನಲ್ಲಿ ಸೂರ್ಯನ ಬೆಳಕು ಇಣುಕುತ್ತಿತ್ತು. ಕೊಡಪಾನಕ್ಕೆ ಹಗ್ಗ ಪೋಣಿಸಿ ಸರ್ರನೆ ಬಾವಿಯೊಳಕ್ಕೆ ಇಳಿಸಿದ ರಭಸಕ್ಕೆ ನೀರು ಅಲೆಅಲೆಯಾಗಿ ಹಮೀದೆಗೆ ತನ್ನ ಮುಖ ಬಾವಿಯೊಳಗೆ ಕದಡಿ ಕದಡಿ ಕಂಡು ಹೆದರಿಕೆಯಾಯಿತು.
May 10th, 2011 at 6:50 pm
[…] also has another advantage: they have consciously tried to own people’s names as an SEO strategy. This is probably responsible for a huge fraction of their traffic. They don’t find people […]
February 11th, 2012 at 11:04 am
Thanks for taking the time to discuss this, I feel strongly about it and love learning more on this topic.
If possible, as you gain expertise, would you mind updating your blog with more information? It is extremely
helpful for me
http://www.apguide.com
June 4th, 2012 at 3:45 am
Great way to get deep content pages indexed by SEs. Also by tightening their people and company (by creating thousands of them at first) pages, LinkedIn improved their indexation.